Assessment of the eighth session of the Committee on Disaster Risk Reduction

View/ Open
Date
2023-07Cite
Bibliographic Managers
RT Generic T1 Assessment of the eighth session of the Committee on Disaster Risk Reduction A1 Unknown author YR 2023-07 LK https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12870/6448 PB UN.ESCAP AB <p>The survey indicates a generally positive perception of the meeting, with average scores ranging from 3.82 to 4.41 out of 5 across various aspects. Highest scores were observed for the reflection of current trends/issues, enhancement of knowledge on early warning systems, promotion of regional cooperation, and timely organization of the meeting.</p><p>However, comments were received on room for improvement in the discussion of gender-related issues, facilitator engagement, quality of documents and presentations, and the technical quality of the online platform.</p> TY - GEN T1 - Assessment of the eighth session of the Committee on Disaster Risk Reduction AU - Unknown author Y1 - 2023-07 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12870/6448 PB - UN.ESCAP AB -The survey indicates a generally positive perception of the meeting, with average scores ranging from 3.82 to 4.41 out of 5 across various aspects. Highest scores were observed for the reflection of current trends/issues, enhancement of knowledge on early warning systems, promotion of regional cooperation, and timely organization of the meeting.
However, comments were received on room for improvement in the discussion of gender-related issues, facilitator engagement, quality of documents and presentations, and the technical quality of the online platform.
@misc{20.500.12870_6448 author = {Unknown author}, title = {Assessment of the eighth session of the Committee on Disaster Risk Reduction}, year = {2023-07}, abstract = {The survey indicates a generally positive perception of the meeting, with average scores ranging from 3.82 to 4.41 out of 5 across various aspects. Highest scores were observed for the reflection of current trends/issues, enhancement of knowledge on early warning systems, promotion of regional cooperation, and timely organization of the meeting.
However, comments were received on room for improvement in the discussion of gender-related issues, facilitator engagement, quality of documents and presentations, and the technical quality of the online platform.
}, url = {https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12870/6448} } @misc{20.500.12870_6448 author = {Unknown author}, title = {Assessment of the eighth session of the Committee on Disaster Risk Reduction}, year = {2023-07}, abstract = {The survey indicates a generally positive perception of the meeting, with average scores ranging from 3.82 to 4.41 out of 5 across various aspects. Highest scores were observed for the reflection of current trends/issues, enhancement of knowledge on early warning systems, promotion of regional cooperation, and timely organization of the meeting.
However, comments were received on room for improvement in the discussion of gender-related issues, facilitator engagement, quality of documents and presentations, and the technical quality of the online platform.
}, url = {https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12870/6448} } TY - GEN T1 - Assessment of the eighth session of the Committee on Disaster Risk Reduction AU - Unknown author UR - https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12870/6448 PB - UN.ESCAP AB -The survey indicates a generally positive perception of the meeting, with average scores ranging from 3.82 to 4.41 out of 5 across various aspects. Highest scores were observed for the reflection of current trends/issues, enhancement of knowledge on early warning systems, promotion of regional cooperation, and timely organization of the meeting.
However, comments were received on room for improvement in the discussion of gender-related issues, facilitator engagement, quality of documents and presentations, and the technical quality of the online platform.
Metadata
Show full item recordUNBIST Subject
Abstract
The survey indicates a generally positive perception of the meeting, with average scores ranging from 3.82 to 4.41 out of 5 across various aspects. Highest scores were observed for the reflection of current trends/issues, enhancement of knowledge on early warning systems, promotion of regional cooperation, and timely organization of the meeting.
However, comments were received on room for improvement in the discussion of gender-related issues, facilitator engagement, quality of documents and presentations, and the technical quality of the online platform.